basix.blogg.se - Waldorf blofeld editor 2016

#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 PATCH#
#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 SOFTWARE#
#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 LICENSE#
#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 PLUS#

#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 LICENSE#

Thanks for taking the time to highlight the specifics! (itching to try Largo again bad my demo license expired () Great article here! The map really helps one to put it all into perspective and make a decision about which machine is the right one to own. It’s unforgivable really, even if it’s a great-sounding hardware unit – wasn’t digital hardware supposed to eliminate much of the unreliability of analogue (as well as there being much deeper synthesis possibilities also of course)?. The problem is, this is a VERY common issue. They’re not easy to grip, which makes the value skipping worse. It’s a shame, but I really don’t like the knobs. I like the sound, especially for pads etc, I’m not so keen on it’s bass capabilities – it seems to be missing something in the upper midrange for me, and opening the filter didn’t introduce those frequencies However, love some of the sounds, but unless I was to be gauranteed I would get a unit where the knobs worked, I’ll have to go with Largo. Values skipping like crazy, values not moving at all unless you turn the knob slowly, and also bugs like when changing oscillator shape, it didn’t change the oscillator sound for quite a few seconds. Buggy to the extent that it was almost uneditable. Unfortunately, I’ve yet to play a Blofeld that isn’t incredibly buggy. I love hardware units, I have a Virus KC, which is rock-solid, no parameter jumping, no glitches. If you found this article inspiring, helpful, or a time-saver, click here. Synthesist, Electronic Musician, Producer Official Web Site: Listen/Download Albums: Thanks for reading, Synthesist | Composer | Keyboardist | Performer

Other Posts on Modulate This! related to : Blofeld | Largo.

Use Blofeld as a control surface for Largo.

Use Largo as a VST/AU editor for Blofeld.

I wish that Waldorf will go a step further with both synths to bring them to parity and line up synth parameters such that we all could could: Also, some parameters like waveshape number are 0-based on Blofeld and 1-based on Largo (Blofled uses waveshape 0 as oscillator off where Largo has a dedicated parameter for this). That being said, I don’t think this is currently an intended use as it’s not document, a bit fiddly, and as you can see from the mindmap there are architectural differences. This is possible because Waldorf designed both Largo and Blofeld such that each parameter has a corresponding MIDI CCs (which is how third party editors communication with Blofeld). What you might not know is that you can do something similar on the Waldorf side by using Blofeld as a dedicated control surface for Largo. The company Touch Digital Controllers is getting some buzz around their dedicated ImpOSCar2 hardware controller. Using Blofeld as a Dedicated Hardware Interface for Largo

#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 PATCH#

As a matter of fact, I have a new song on the upcoming album that was built almost exclusively around one patch where I do crazy things with the chorus using automation from dummy clips in Ableton Live.

Largo’s effects – especially the chorus are also quite fantastic. So by adding Largo I have that Waldorf sound and architecture on my laptop and can use it in live performances out of town. However, my current performance rig is laptop-based and fits in two carry-ons (including my controllers) and I didn’t have room haul even the desktop Blofeld. I actually got the desktop, then sold it to get the keyboard edition for studio and jam use. I got the Blofeld first and fell in love with Waldorf waveforms, oscillators, filters, and architecture. The color coding in the mindmap should help you make your choice. The effects processor section is definitely stronger in Largo, especially the chorus. If you want to use samples, you have to go with the Keyboard or Desktop Edition with License SL. If your primary goal is programming patches from scratch and you don’t care about samples being used as oscillator sources, Largo has a bigger sonic range in my opinion. Green highlights on a branch indicate which synth is better in a particular area. I’ve created a mindmap to illustrate only the differences.

The parameter differences are not simply that one has more features than another -each has exclusive features, and some cases – such as effects – the features are similar but implemented differently.

#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 SOFTWARE#

If you programmed a patch on either using parameters common to both without effects the resultant output would almost identical with just slight variance in timbre you’d expect from hardware vs software implementations.

I’d say that the patch architecture about 98% similar.

#WALDORF BLOFELD EDITOR 2016 PLUS#

I own both the Waldorf Blofeld keyboard edition plus the virtual instrument Largo so I thought I’d offer some notes on what is the same and what is different.įirst let me say that Largo is indeed a Blofeld expressed as a virtual instrument.